Wednesday 30 November 2022

Book Release: Islam and the Problems of the Youth

 Alhamdulilah, the book is now available




The book is available from Nawa Books and they ship worldwide. The other books in the series are available here.


And with Allah alone is every success!

Saturday 5 November 2022

What are the Mufaṣṣal in the Qurʾān?

What should you be reciting in each prayer? (an extract from the upcoming translation of Al-Fiqh al-Manhajī ʿalā Madhhab al-Imām ash-Shāfiʿī)


8. Reciting Some Portion of the Qurʾān after the Fātiḥah:

The sunnah is realised by reciting a sūrah of the Qurʾān, however short it may be, or by reciting three consecutive verses.

It is only recommended in the first two units of any prayer, whether one be the imam or praying alone. As for the one praying behind an imam, it is recommended in quiet prayers or when he is too far away to hear the imam’s recitation.

In the ṣubḥ and ẓuhr prayers, it recommended to recite the sūrahs that are known as ṭiwāl[1] al-mufaṣṣal, such as al-Ḥujurāt (49) and ar-Raḥmān (55). In the ʿaṣr and ʿishāʾ prayers, it is recommended to recite the awāṣit[2] al-mufaṣsāl, such as ash-Shams (91) and al-Layl (92). In the maghrib prayer, the qiṣār[3] al-mufaṣṣal are recommended, such as al-Ikhlāṣ (112).[4] This is due to the ḥadīth of an-Nasāʾī (2/127) on the authority of Sulaymān ibn Yasār from Abū Hurayrah t, who said, ‘I have not prayed behind anyone whose prayer resembled that of Allah’s Messenger e more than that of so-and-so. We prayed behind him and he would make the first two units of ẓuhr long and the later two light. He would make ʿasr light and he would recite the qiṣār al-mufaṣṣal in maghrib. In ʿishāʾ he would recite Wa sh-shamsī wa ḍuḥāhā[5] and similar sūrahs and in ṣubḥ he would recite two long sūrahs’.

 

It is also recommended to recite Ālif Lām Mīm Tanzīl, i.e. Sūrat as-Sajdah (32) in the first unit of the dawn prayer on Friday and Hal Atā[6] in the second unit.

This is due to what has been related by al-Bukhārī (851), as well as Muslim (880), on the authority of Abū Hurayrah twho said, ‘In the fajr prayer on Friday, the Prophet e would recite Ālif Lām Mīm Tanzīl – i.e. as-Sajdah – and Hal Atā ʿAlā l-Insān.

It is recommended to make the first unit longer than the second in all prayers, due to what has been related by al-Bukhārī (725) and Muslim (451): ‘The Prophet e…would recite at length in the first and shorten his recitation in the second.’

[Translated from Al-Fiqh al-Manhajī ʿalā Madhhab al-Imām ash-Shāfiʿī (Damascus: Dār al-ʿUlūm al-Insāniyyah, 1410/1989), 1:152-153]



[1] (tn): i.e. long.
[2] (tn): i.e. medium length.
[3] (tn): i.e. short.
[4] (tn): these sūrahs are called mufaṣṣal for a few reasons. According to Imam an-Nawawī, it is because there are frequent breaks (fuṣūl) between the sūrahs (i.e. the sūrahs are shorter), while it has also been said that there are very few abrogated verses therein. The imam also states that they start from Sūrat al-Ḥujurāt and continue through to the end of the Qurʾān. See Daqāʾiq al-Minhāj (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1416/1997), 43. Imam Shams ad-Dīn ar-Ramlī says that mufaṣṣal means mubīn, i.e. made clear, and he quotes Sūrat Fuṣṣilat: “A Book whose verses have been made clear (fuṣṣilat).” [41:3] That is, the details of different meanings have been brought about. See Nihāyat al-Muḥtāj ilā Sharḥ al-Minhāj (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1424/2003) 1:495. As for which sūrahs therein are long, medium length, or short, Imam Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī says that the ṭiwāl are from Sūrat al-Ḥujurāt to Sūrat an-Nabaʾ, the awāsiṭ (or awsāṭ) are from an-Nabaʾ to Sūrat ad-Ḍuḥā, and the qiṣār are from ad-Ḍuḥā to the end. This is the dominant position. See Tuḥfat al-Muḥtāj bi Sharḥ al-Minhāj (Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1437/2016) 1:246.
[5] (tn): i.e. Sūrat ash-Shams (91).
[6] (tn): i.e. Sūrat al-Insān (76).

Wednesday 31 August 2022

Praying and Fasting after an Abortion

A translation of this fatwa from Naseem al-Sham

Question:

I had an abortion after being pregnant for about 45 days. I inquired about this and one of the sheikhs gave me a fatwā stating that it was obligatory for me to pray after the adhān,[1] and that I also must fast, because the blood is considered abnormal blood (dam fasād) and therefore my ruling is that of a woman who has istiḥādah.[2] I want to ask if what I have done is correct and whether I am obligated to make up my fasts.

Answer (Imam Rushdī Saleem al-Qalam):

Whether a baby comes out alive or dead,[3] the blood that follows is blood of nifās.[4] The period during which one is cut off from purification is called nifās; the obligation to pray is lifted, whatever fasts are missed must be made up, and it is unlawful for a man to approach his wife.[5] You do not have istiḥāḍah. Istiḥāḍah is when blood comes out after the maximum duration for ḥayḍ[6] or the maximum duration for nifās. Ḥayḍ is no more than 15 days for the Shāfiʿīs and 10 days for the Ḥanafīs, while nifās is no more than 60 days for the Shāfiʿīs and 40 days for the Ḥanafīs.


[1] (tn): i.e. once the time for each prayer has entered.
[2][(tn): i.e. abnormal bleeding.
[3] Ar. isqāṭ, i.e. a miscarriage or abortion.
[4] (tn): i.e. post-natal bleeding.
[5] (tn): i.e. have sexual intercourse with her.
[6] (tn): i.e. menstruation.

Tuesday 30 August 2022

Mixed Wealth: Someone works in a usurious bank…can I eat from his home?

A translation of this fatwa from Naseem al-Sham


Question:

Faḍīlat ad-Daktūr al-ʿAlāmah, Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān al-Būṭī (may Allah protect him), I have a friend who works in a usurious bank. Is his wealth considered lawful, i.e. if we were to visit him in his home and eat his food, would we be consuming usurious wealth? Please benefit us and may Allah the Exalted benefit you and grant you the highest station of nearness to Him.

Answer (Imam Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān al-Būṭī):

If your friend’s income is a mixture of that which is lawful and that which is unlawful, there is no objection in the Revealed Law to your receiving his hospitality and eating his food. If, on the other hand, his entire income is from unlawful wealth, it is not permissible for you to consume any of his wealth, whether by transferring ownership of something[1] or by way of eating.[2]


[1] (tn): e.g. accepting a gift from him, purchasing something from him. 
[2] (tn): i.e. what some scholars milk al-intifāʿ, or the ownership of benefiting from something while not being authorised to rent it, sell it, or otherwise exchange it. See Ash-Sharikāt wa Aḥkamuhā fī al-Fiqh al-Islāmī: Dirāsah Muqāranah fī ash-Sharikāt al-Islmāmiyyah by Imam Muḥammad at-Tāwīl (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1430/2009,) 34-45.

Monday 22 August 2022

Book Release: To Every Young Woman Who Believes In Allah



Alhamdulilah, the book is now available





The book is available from Nawa Books and they ship worldwide. Insha'Allah, bookstores in Europe, North America and elsewhere will be stocking it soon.


And with Allah alone is every success!


Monday 27 June 2022

The Big Step Revisited

A new podcast on The Big Step and related topics, with Brother Abdullah Yousef, is now available.


Please click here to listen to the podcast.

The Big Step (as well as all other Lulu print products) has a 15% discount this week, through July 1. Use the code HUSTLE15

Monday 13 June 2022

Is Ribā the Same Now as It Was Then?

An extract from the book The Great Event Has Occurred: Usury Has Become Permissible by Imam Muammad at-Tāwīl, may Allah have mercy on him


The first of these justifications is that bank transactions are a modern form of transaction that was completely unknown to previous fuqahāʾ, as some people say.

The purpose of such a statement is to take the topic out of the purview of the texts and place it within the scope of juridical reasoning (ijtihād), so that it is easy to say that it is permissible in the name of ijtihād, making matters easier and reviving the faith by bringing it up to date.

It is a statement that is inaccurate and incorrect, for indeed this transaction was known before the advent of Islam. The only thing that is new is the outward form and the name, i.e. the building and the employees inside, the title “bank” written on the front and the word “interest” or “return” or “rate” used to cover the usury. As for the essence, the subject matter that takes place inside the building, it is the borrowing of cash and lending it with a surplus. It was known in the Age of Ignorance (al-Jāhiliyyah) before the advent of Islam. Imam Abū Bakr ar-Rāzī al-Jaṣṣāṣ says in his Qurʾānic commentary Aḥkām al-Qurʾān, ‘the usury that the Arabs knew and practiced was the lending of dirhams and dinars for a specified period of time with a surplus added to the amount borrowed according to what both parties agree upon.’[1] As-Suddī says regarding the reason behind the revelation of the Exalted’s statement:

)يَٰٓأَيُّهَا اَ۬لذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ اُ۪تَّقُواْ اُ۬للَّهَ وَذَرُواْ مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ اَ۬لرِّبَوٰٓاْ إِن كُنتُم مُّومِنِينَۖ( 

“You who believe! Have taqwā of Allah and forgo any remaining usury if you are believers” [al-Baqarah 2:278],

‘This was revealed with regards to al-ʿAbbās ibn ʿAbdul Muṭṭalib and Khālid ibn Walīd. They were partners in al-Jāhiliyyah and they would lend money usuriously. Islam came and the two of them had vast wealth from usury, so Allah sent down this verse.’[2] The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, {Indeed, every usury from the usury of al-Jāhiliyyah has been abolished, and the first usury that I abolish is the usury of al-ʿAbbās ibn ʿAbdul Muṭṭalib.}[3] Ibn Ḥajar said, ‘A person in al-Jāhiliyyah would give money to someone else for a specified period of time on the basis that every month he would take a certain amount while the principal remained as it was. When the time had passed he would reclaim the principal from him and if he was unable to pay it, extra time would be granted and there would be more monthly payments.’[4] Fakhr ad-Dīn ar-Rāzī said, ‘As for the usury of credit, it is a matter that was well-known and customary in al-Jāhiliyyah. They would give money on the basis that every month they would take a specific amount while the principal remained unchanged. When the specified time had passed, they would reclaim the principal from the borrower. If he was unable to pay it, extra time would be granted and there would be more monthly payments.’[5] This is the usury that they traded in al-Jāhiliyyah and it is exactly the same as bank transactions. The customer gives his money to the bank for periods of time that are agreed upon and every month he claims set amounts while the principal remains unchanged. 

Sheikh Kanūn said, ‘This kind is well-known amongst people today and it happens frequently’.[6]

Likewise, giving money to someone who is going to invest it for a share of the profit, or the worker getting a fixed fee while all the profit goes to the owner of the money, this was also known and the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, went out and traded with Khadījah’s money, may Allah be pleased with her, before he married her.[7]

Likewise, depositing money in a current account was also known to the Muslims early on, for az-Zubayr ibn al-ʿAwwām, may Allah be pleased with him, would have people come to him with monetary deposits for him to safekeep on their behalf. He refused to accept them unless it was on the condition that they be a debt that he was liable for, for fear that he would lose them, as has been narrated by al-Bukhārī.[8]

It is thus apparent that the statement that bank transactions are a new sort of transaction that was hitherto unknown is incorrect, because what is relevant is the substance and not the form, and matters are according to their objectives, as the scholars of jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh) say. Yes, after the coming of Islam, lending with a surplus was declared unlawful, and muḍārabah[9] with a fixed share hid these transactions from the Islamic society that was adhering to Allah’s Revealed Law. This was until they emerged with the appearance of colonialism and adopted new names that allowed them to deceive some people and put doubts in the minds of others who were incapable of penetrating their depths and knowing their reality, which is that it is undoubtedly lending and borrowing with a surplus and that it is the very same usury that Allah and His Messenger declared unlawful and cursed the one who consumes it, the one who feeds it, the one who writes it down, the one who witnesses it, the one who assists in it and the one who calls to it.

The second justification is that they say, ‘There is no clear text in the Book of Allah or the Sunnah of His Messenger, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, that declares this transaction unlawful.’

Like the one that precedes it, this statement is also inaccurate and incorrect for the following reasons:

First of all, it shows disavowal of scholarly consensus (ijmāʿ) and other sources of legislation and confines all legislation to the Book and the Sunnah. In fact, those who make this statement are not even convinced of implicit indications in both the Qurʾān and the Ḥadīth. This is ẓāhiriyyah that is more intransigent than the original ẓāhiriyyah,[10] those rejected by the erudite scholars.

Secondly, we can say yes, there are clear texts in the Book and the Sunnah that forbid this transaction and declare it unlawful. As for the Book, there is the Exalted’s Statement:

 )وَأَحَلَّ اَ۬للَّهُ اُ۬لْبَيْعَ وَحَرَّمَ اَ۬لرِّبَوٰاْۖ(

“But Allah has permitted trade and forbidden usury.” [al-Baqarah 2:275] There is also His statement:

)يَمْحَقُ اُ۬للَّهُ اُ۬لرِّبَوٰاْ(

“Allah obliterates usury.” [al-Baqarah 2:276]

There is also His statement:

)يَٰٓأَيُّهَا اَ۬لذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لَا تَاكُلُواْ اُ۬لرِّبَوٰٓاْ أَضْعَٰفاٗ مُّضَٰعَفَةٗۖ(

“You who believe! Do not feed on usury, multiplied and then remultiplied.” [Āl ʿImrān 3:130]

There is also His statement:

)اَ۬لذِينَ يَاكُلُونَ اَ۬لرِّبَوٰاْ لَا يَقُومُونَ إِلَّا كَمَا يَقُومُ اُ۬لذِے يَتَخَبَّطُهُ اُ۬لشَّيْطَٰنُ مِنَ اَ۬لْمَسِّۖ(

“Those who practise usury will not rise from the grave except as someone driven mad by Shayṭān’s touch” [al-Baqarah 2:275]

 

And there is His statement:

)اُ۪تَّقُواْ اُ۬للَّهَ وَذَرُواْ مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ اَ۬لرِّبَوٰٓاْ إِن كُنتُم مُّومِنِينَۖ( 

“Have taqwā of Allah and forego any remaining usury.” [al-Baqarah 2:278]

In the Arabic language, ribā means increase, and in the Revealed Law it means the increase on one of two things being exchanged without any compensation. There is no doubt that the bank pays one hundred and reclaims one hundred and ten, for example, when it is the lender, and it receives one hundred from the depositing customer and gives him back one hundred and ten when it is the lender, even if it only calls it a deposit.

And we observe the principles of jurisprudence, which state:

-       Singular nouns that have the definite article (al) indicate universal applicability.

-       The universal (al-ʿāmm) is understood to indicate universal applicability until there is something that makes it particular.

-       The universal indicating individuals is an indication of conformity, every individual therein bearing the same ruling in conformity, whether in affirmation or negation.

-       The indication of conformity is by way of something clearly articulated according to the scholars of jurisprudence.

-       The general indicating every individual from amongst its individuals is a decisive indication according to the Ḥanafīs, and it has the rank of the specific (al-khāṣṣ) in its indication of its individuals.

 

What we gather from all of this is that the verses of usury indicate that bank interest is unlawful and they indicate it clearly because they comprise it decisively, because it is the increase on one of two things being exchanged without any compensation, and thus it is included within the generality of usury. This is why the scholars say, ‘the universal indicates the ruling in general and in detail as long as it is not made particular by some evidence.’ 

An example of this is very often found in the ḥadīths about usury, such as the ḥadīth: ‘The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, cursed the one who consumes usury, the one who feeds it, the one who writes it down and the one who witnesses it.’[11]

And there is the ḥadīth: {Beware of the sins that are not forgiven; taking something secretly, for whoever takes something secretly brings it on the Day of Standing, and the consumer of usury, for whoever consumes usury is resurrected on the Day of Standing as a fumbling madman.}[12]

And there is the ḥadīth: {Usury is ninety-nine doors, the least of which is like a man approaching his mother}[13] and the ḥadīth: {Usury is seventy parts, the least of which is a man having sex with his mother.}[14] There are others and they also comprise bank interest, as is indicated by conformity, and clearly so. If we observe the abovementioned principles of jurisprudence, are these people going to wait until they find in the Qurʾān and the Sunnah the expression, ‘bank interest is unlawful’ before they become convinced that the Qurʾān and Sunnah contain a clear text declaring it unlawful?

Is not the aforementioned from al-Jaṣṣāṣ, as-Suddī and others sufficient in proving that usury was known to the Arabs and that it is lending with a surplus, and that the Exalted’s statement:

)يَٰٓأَيُّهَا اَ۬لذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ اُ۪تَّقُواْ اُ۬للَّهَ وَذَرُواْ مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ اَ۬لرِّبَوٰٓاْ إِن كُنتُم مُّومِنِينَۖ( 

“You who believe! Have taqwā of Allah and forgo any remaining usury” [al-Baqarah 2:278] came down regarding lending with a surplus, and that the jurisprudential principle that the illustration of the reason (sabab) makes it decisively general and cannot be made particular through juridical reasoning (ijtihād), as is stated by the scholars of jurisprudence? This means that the lending with a surplus that is practised by the bank, in both giving and taking, in the name of interest or return or whatever else, is the same usury that is commanded to be abandoned in this verse, and it is decisively and definitely included and comprised therein. Also, the verse is a clear text declaring it unlawful. So, after this, is it valid to say that the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, contain no clear text declaring bank interest unlawful?

 


[1] Aḥkām al-Qurʾān by al-Jaṣṣāṣ, 1/1465

[2] Asbāb an-Nuzūl.

[3] Ibid, al-Wāḥidī, p.59.

[4] See Ḥāshiyah Kanūn ʿalā ar-Rahūnī 5/92.

[5] At-Tafsīr al-Kabīr by al-Fakhr ar-Rāzī.

[6] Ḥāshiyah Kanūn ʿalā ar-Rahūnī 5/92.

[7] See Sīrat Ibn Hishām 1/203.

[8] Al-Fatḥ 6/228.

[9] (tn): Referred to in English as a sleeping partnership, this is an agreement in which one party provides the capital while the other does all the work and the profits are shared between the two based on whatever they agree upon. It is also called qirāḍ in Arabic.

[10] (tn): i.e. the literalists, a school of law founded by Dāwūd az-Ẓāhirī (d.270 AH) and later died out due its rigid literalism.

[11] Related by Abū Dāwūd 3/244.

[12] Related by at-Ṭabarānī, see Ḥāshiyat Kanūn ʿalā ar-Rahūnī 5/93.

[13] Al-Jāmiʿ li Aḥkām al-Qurʾān 3/236.

[14] Related by Ibn Mājah and al-Ḥākim, see Mukhtaar Ibn Kathīr 1/247.

Thursday 17 March 2022

Book Release: A Unique Pedagogical Approach in the Qurʾān

 Alhamdulilah, the book is now available


The book is available from Nawa Books and they ship worldwide. Insha'Allah, bookstores in Europe, North America and elsewhere will be stocking it soon.


And with Allah alone is every success!


Monday 21 February 2022

So that I can enjoy looking at you

 From Chapter 31: Visiting the Graves and the Deceased Seeing Their Visitors


وَقَالَ السلَفِي سَمِعت أَبَا البركات عبد الْوَاحِد بن عبد الرَّحْمَن بن غلاب السُّوسِي بالإسكندرية يَقُول سَمِعت والدتي تَقول رَأَيْت أُمِّي فِي الْمَنَام بعد مَوتهَا وَهِي تَقول يَا بِنْتي إِذا جئتني زائرة فاقعدي عِنْد قَبْرِي سَاعَة أتملى من النّظر إِلَيْك ثمَّ ترحمي عَليّ فَإنَّك إِذا ترحمت عَليّ صَارَت الرَّحْمَة بيني وَبَيْنك كالحجاب ثمَّ شغلتني عَنْك.

984) Al-Silafī has said, ‘I heard Abū al-Barakāt ʿAbdul Wāḥid ibn ʿAbdur Raḥmān ibn Ghallāb as-Sūsī in Alexandria and he was saying, “I heard my mother saying, ‘I saw my mother in my sleep after her death and she was saying, “My dear daughter, when you come to me as a visitor, just sit by my grave for some time so that I can enjoy looking at you. Then ask Allah to have mercy on me, because when you ask Allah to have mercy on me it becomes like a barrier between me and you, and then it distracts me from you.”’”’

 

[From the book The Opening of the Hearts (The Foreword Publications, 1442/2020), p. 344, which is a translation of Shar as-udūr by Imam Jalāl ad-Dīn as-Suyūṭī.]


The Opening of the Hearts (and all other Lulu print products) is available with a 15% discount through February 25, 2022. Please use the discount code INCLUSIVE15. 

Friday 18 February 2022

Book Release: Inward Sin

Alhamdulilah, the book is now available




The book is available from Nawa Books and they ship worldwide. Insha'Allah, bookstores in Europe, North America and elsewhere will be stocking it soon.


And with Allah alone is every success!


Sunday 16 January 2022

Book Release: Remembrances & Etiquettes of The Prophet ﷺ

Alhamdulilah, the book is now available




The book is available from Nawa Books and they ship worldwide. Insha'Allah, bookstores in Europe, North America and elsewhere will be stocking it soon.

And with Allah alone is every success!