Showing posts with label Family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Family. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 March 2023

Book Release: The Rights of the Husband and Wife

 Alhamdulilah, this book is now available


Blurb:

It is from Allah’s wisdom, Glorified and Exalted is He, that, over time, the Muslims have spread to every corner of the earth. In recent decades, however, this spread has been attributed to several causes, and what has been noticed and is not hidden from anybody who is familiar with the state of Muslims in Western societies is their lacking many of the factors of a social and Islamic upbringing that are normal and customary in Islamic societies. These norms and customs, of course, come from the Revealed Law, whose source is the Book, the Sunnah, the consensus of the Ummah, and the preferred opinions of the imams and scholars. Thus, one of the most important reasons for the social stability that is found in Islamic societies is that life is based on solid foundations that come from the teachings of the Revealed Law.

Shaykh ʿAbdul Hādī al-Kharsah was born in Damascus in 1378 AH/1959 CE and graduated from Al-Azhar in 1980. He has taken knowledge from the senior most Muslim scholars of his age and has several chains of transmission in ḥadīth from the senior most ḥadīth scholars.

The shaykh specialises in theology and Ḥanafī fiqh, as well as the educational and behavioural sciences.

He is considered an authority (marjaʿ) in ash-Shām and the leader of a knowledge-based revival. His preaching is distinguished by moderation, accurate understanding, foresight, and conciliation.

Shaykh ʿAbdul Hādī has also authored several works, and they have had a massive influence on students of knowledge and Islamic communities.

Nawa Books ships worldwide and the book should also be available from Amazon very soon, if Allah so wills. Watch this space!

And with Allah alone is every success.

UPDATE: THE BOOK IS NOW AVAILABLE FROM AMAZON UK.

Wednesday, 31 August 2022

Praying and Fasting after an Abortion

A translation of this fatwa from Naseem al-Sham

Question:

I had an abortion after being pregnant for about 45 days. I inquired about this and one of the sheikhs gave me a fatwā stating that it was obligatory for me to pray after the adhān,[1] and that I also must fast, because the blood is considered abnormal blood (dam fasād) and therefore my ruling is that of a woman who has istiḥādah.[2] I want to ask if what I have done is correct and whether I am obligated to make up my fasts.

Answer (Imam Rushdī Saleem al-Qalam):

Whether a baby comes out alive or dead,[3] the blood that follows is blood of nifās.[4] The period during which one is cut off from purification is called nifās; the obligation to pray is lifted, whatever fasts are missed must be made up, and it is unlawful for a man to approach his wife.[5] You do not have istiḥāḍah. Istiḥāḍah is when blood comes out after the maximum duration for ḥayḍ[6] or the maximum duration for nifās. Ḥayḍ is no more than 15 days for the Shāfiʿīs and 10 days for the Ḥanafīs, while nifās is no more than 60 days for the Shāfiʿīs and 40 days for the Ḥanafīs.


[1] (tn): i.e. once the time for each prayer has entered.
[2][(tn): i.e. abnormal bleeding.
[3] Ar. isqāṭ, i.e. a miscarriage or abortion.
[4] (tn): i.e. post-natal bleeding.
[5] (tn): i.e. have sexual intercourse with her.
[6] (tn): i.e. menstruation.

Wednesday, 22 April 2020

When is Fidyah Obligatory Upon Someone Who Did Not Fast Due To An Excuse And How Much Is It?

A translation of this fatwa from Naseem al-Sham

https://mawdoo3.com/%D9%85%D8%A7_%D9%87%D9%88_%D9%85%D9%82%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B9_%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%88


Question: 

Sheikh Muḥammad Tawfīq, may Allah grant you success. What is the ruling in the Revealed Law regarding a woman who paid 3000 lira as expiation (kaffārah) for not fasting the Ramaḍān before last? Does she still have to fast those days or not?

Answer (Imam Muḥammad Tawfīq Ramaḍān):

If she was not fasting because of an excuse, meaning that she did not fast because she feared for herself, then she has to make up those days and she does not have to pay a fidyah. She only has to make them up as long as a year does not elapse without her making up the fasts and she does not have an excuse. This is because if someone delays making up the fasts for one year and they do not have an excuse, they still have to make up the fasts and they have to pay a fidyah for each day, which is a mudd of food (half a kilogram of rice, for example).

If she did not fast for fear of a child she was nursing or a child she was carrying, and not for fear of herself, then she must make up those days and pay the fidyah for each day, which is half a kilogram of food.

Further Reading:
Not Fasting Due To Illness
Fidyah, Qaḍāʾ and Breaking One's Fast
More Fatawa on Ramadan and Fasting

Monday, 11 November 2019

Whoever of You is Capable of Al-Bāʾat, Let Him Get Married

What does al-bāʾat mean? Imam an-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy on him, explains

عَنْ عَبْدُ اللهِ بِنْ مَسْعُودٍ رَضِيَ اللهُ تَعالَى عَنْهُ قَالَ: قَالَ لَنَا رَسُولُ اللهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم: {يا مَعْشَرَ الشَّبابِ، مَنِ اسْتَطَاعَ مِنْكُمْ الْبَاءَةَ فَلْيَتَزَوَّجْ. فَإِنَّهُ أَغَضُّ لِلْبَصَرِ وَأَحْصَنُ لِلْفَرْجِ وَمَنْ لَمْ يَسْتَطِعْ فَعَلَيْهِ بالصَّوْمِ فَإِنَّهُ لَهُ وِجَاءٌ.}


It is on the authority of ʿAbdullah ibn Masʿūd, may Allah be pleased with him, who said, ‘The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said to us, {O gathering[1] of youth![2] Whoever of you is capable of al-bāʾat, let him get married, for it lowers the gaze and protects the private parts. Whoever is not able to must fast, for it will cut his desire.}’[3] Agreed upon.[4]


Imam an-Nawawī: [5] The people of language have said that a maʿshar is a group of people who are included under one attribute, and thus the youth (ash-shabāb) are a maʿshar, the elderly (ash-shuyūkh) are a maʿshar, the Prophets are a maʿshar, women are a maʿshar, and so on and so forth. Ash-Shabāb is the plural of shāb, and other plurals include shubān, shababah and ash-shāb according to our companions,[6] and it is someone who is an adult[7] but has not passed thirty years of age.

As for al-bāʾat, al-Qāḍī ʿIyāḍ[8] has mentioned four ways of saying it. The well-known, eloquent way is al-bāʾat,[9] with an extension (madd)[10] and hāʾ[11] at the end. The second is al-bāt,[12] with no extension. The third is al-bāʾ[13] with an extension and the fourth is al-bāhah[14] with two hāʾ at and no extension. Its original meaning in the language is sexual intercourse and it is derived from the word al-mubāʾat, which is a residence, and from that we have the expression mubāʾat al-ibl (camel), i.e. where it lives. Then a marriage contract was called a bāʾat because when a man marries a woman, he gives her somewhere to live. The scholars have differed as to what al-bāʾat means here, and there are two positions that go back to one meaning:

The more correct position is that what is meant here is its linguistic meaning, which is sexual intercourse, and thus, what is implied here is that whoever of you is capable of sexual intercourse due to his ability to provide for it, which is to provide for a marriage, let him get married. Whoever is not capable of sexual intercourse due to his inability to provide for it must fast in order to ward off his passions and cut off his evil desires, just as al-wijāʾ[15] cuts it off. According to this position, this address was given to young men who were presumed to be desiring women and were not separating themselves from them most of the time.

The second position is that what is meant by al-bāʾat here is the provisions of marriage, and it is called by that which accompanies it. The implication is that whoever is capable of the provisions of marriage let him get married. Whoever is not capable let him fast in order to ward off his desires. Those who hold this position were prompted to do so because of his statement, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, {Whoever is not able to must fast.} They said, ‘The one who is incapable of sexual intercourse does not need to fast in order to ward off his desires. Thus, al-bāʾat must be interpreted to mean provisions.’ The former group respond with what we have already mentioned in the position above, which is that the implication is that whoever is incapable of sexual intercourse due to his inability to provide for it while being in need of sexual intercourse must fast, and Allah knows best.

As for al-wijāʾ, it is to crush the testicles, and what is meant here is that fasting cuts passions and cuts evil desires just as al-wijāʾ does.

This ḥadīth contains a command to marry for the one who is able to and his soul desires it, and this is the consensus. However, according to us[16] and all scholars, the command is one of recommendation[17] and not obligation.[18] Thus, no one is obligated to get married or take a concubine, regardless of whether or not they fear adversity. This is the position of all scholars and no one is known to have obligated it apart from Dāwūd and those who agree with him amongst the Ẓāhiriyyah,[19] and there is one narration from Aḥmad in which they said that he is obligated to get married or take a concubine if he fears adversity. They have also said that he is only obligated to do it once in his life and some of them did not stipulate that he fear adversity. The Ẓāhiriyyah said that he is only obligated to get married and he is not obligated to have intercourse, and they clung to the outward purport of this ḥadīth as well as other ḥadīths and the Qurʾān. Allah has said, “…marry other permissible women…” [an-Nisāʾ 4:3] as well as other āyāt, and the majority have used the Exalted One’s statement “…marry other permissible women…” [an-Nisāʾ 4:3] up until His statement “…or those you own as slaves” [an-Nisāʾ 4:3] as proof that Allah, Glorified and Exalted is He, has given a choice between marriage and taking a concubine. Al-Imām al-Māzarī[20] said, ‘This the majority’s proof that He, Glorified and Exalted is He, has given a choice between marriage and taking a concubine, by consensus, because if marriage were an obligation, He would not have offered a choice between it and taking a concubine. This is because it is not valid according to the scholars of uṣūl al-fiqh to offer a choice between something obligatory and something else, because that would nullify the reality of the obligation, and the one leaving it would not be sinful. As for his statement, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, {Whoever turns away from my Sunnah is not from me},[21] the meaning is whoever turns away from it because they renounce it and are not convinced of what it is, and Allah knows best.

As for whether it is better to get married or not, our companions[22] have said that people fall into four categories:
  • The person whose soul desires it and he has the provision[23] for it, and thus it is recommended for him to get married.
  • The person whose soul does not desire it and he does not have the provision for it, and thus it is disliked[24] for him. 
  • The person whose soul desires it and he does not have the provision for it, and thus it is disliked for him, and it is this person who is commanded to fast in order to ward off his desire. 
  • The person who has the provision for it but not the desire, and the position of ash-Shāfiʿī and the majority of our companions is that leaving marriage and devoting oneself to worship is better for such a person. It is not said that marriage is disliked (makrūh). Rather, leaving it is preferable. The position of Abū Ḥanīfah, some of the followers of ash-Shāfiʿī and some of the followers of Mālik is that marriage is better for him, and Allah knows best.
______________
[1] Ar. maʿshar
[2] Ar. ash-shabāb
[3] Ar. al-wijāʾ
[4] (tn): Bulūgh al-Marām min Adillat al-Aḥkām by Imam Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (Al-Manṣūrah: Dār al-Ghadd al-Jadīd, 1426/2005), p.200, and it is the first ḥadīth in the Book of Marriage. It is found in the Ṣaḥīḥ collections of both al-Bukhārī and Muslim.
[5] Translated from Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim bi Sharḥ an-Nawawī (Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2003/1424), v.9, p.147-149. This ḥadīth is the first ḥadīth in the Book of Marriage in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim and the title of the first chapter in that book is ‘Marriage Is Recommended For The One Whose Soul Desires It And He Has The Provision, And The One Who In Incapable Of Provision Is To Busy Himself With Fasting’.
[6] (tn): i.e. the Shāfiʿīs
[7] Ar. bāligh, i.e. legally accountable
[8] (tn): i.e. the great Mālikī jurist who died in 544 AH and is buried in Marrakech; his commentary on Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim is called Ikmāl al-Muʿlim bi Fawāʾid Muslim, which is his complement (i.e. ikmāl) of Imam al-Mazarī’s commentary, mentioned below. Please see Ikmāl al-Muʿlim bi Fawāʾid Muslim (Al-Manṣūrah: Dār al-Wafāʾ, 1419/1998), v.1, p.72-74.
[9] (tn): i.e. الباءة
[10] (tn): i.e. with a hamzah
[11] (tn): i.e. a tāʾ marbūṭah
[12] (tn): i.e. الباة
[13] (tn): i.e. الباء
[14] (tn): i.e. الباهة
[15] (tn): this is explained below
[16] (tn): i.e. the Shāfiʿīs
[17] (tn): i.e. one is rewarded for doing it but not punished for leaving it (see Sharḥ al-Waraqāt fī ʿIlm Uṣūl al-Fiqh by Imam Jalāl ad-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Maḥallī ash-Shāfiʿī (Casablanca: Dār ar-Rashād al-Ḥadīthah, 1426/2006), p.5
[18] (tn): i.e. one is rewarded for doing it and punished for leaving it (ibid.)
[19] (tn): i.e. the literalists, a school of law founded by Dāwūd az-Ẓāhirī (d.270 AH) and later died out due to its rigid literalism
[20] (tn): i.e. Imam al-Māzarī is Abū ʿAbdullah Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī, d. 536/1141, the great Mālikī of Sicilian origin whose commentary on Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim is entitled al-Muʿlim bi Fawāʾid Muslim
[21] (tn): this ḥadīth is also agreed upon (i.e. related by al-Bukhārī and Muslim) and is the second ḥadīth in the Book of Marriage in Bulūgh al-Marām. The full wording is, {But I pray and I sleep. I fast and I do not fast. I marry women. Whoever turns away from my Sunnah is not from me.}
[22] (tn): i.e. the Shāfiʿīs
[23] (tn): i.e. he possesses the provisions and expenditure for it, such as the dower and the living costs for himself and his wife (see al-Fiqh al-Manhajī by Imam Muṣṭafā al-Bughā et al. (Damascus, Dār al-Qalam, 1433/2012) v.2. p.13)
[24] Ar. makrūḥ, i.e. one is rewarded for leaving it but not punished for doing it (Sharḥ al-Waraqāt, p.5)

Sunday, 4 August 2019

Book Release: Islamic Law Is Not Misogynistic

By Imam Muhammad at-Taaweel, may Allah have mercy on him



Blurb:

Some people have brought up the problem of “the masculinism of Islamic Law”, claiming that they are doing so in order for women to be defended and shown justice, and to clarify the injustice they have suffered as a result of legislations that have been influenced by the authority of men and their masculinism.

It is a baseless claim and a false statement the purpose of which is to defame our legal scholars and create misgivings about Islamic Law. In these pages, I have written some brief sentences that should benefit anyone eagerly looking for the truth, and should silence every hypocrite, those who are not pleased for men and women to live under the shade of Islam, happy with its divine legislations and laws.


The book also includes appendices by Imams Yahya an-Nawawi, Muhammad Saeed Ramadan al-Bouti, Muhammad Tawfeeq Ramadan, Rushdi Saleem al-Qalam and Abdul Haleem Mahmood. 

And with Allah alone is every success.
Click here to order from Lulu.

UPDATE: The book is now available from Amazon.
The virtual book launch is available here.

UPDATE: If you are in South East Asia or Australia, the book is available here.
UPDATE: If you are in the UK, the book is available here.

Saturday, 13 October 2018

Luqman's Advice To His Son

A follow-up to this podcast from The Foreword


  
In this episode, we look at Ayaat 12-15 from Surat Luqman with the tafseer of Imam Wahbah az-Zuhayli, may Allah have mercy on him. This part covers gratitude to Allah as well as warning against idolatry and showing disobedience to parents.


In this episode, we look at Ayaat 16-19 from Surat Luqman with the tafseer of Imam Wahbah az-Zuhayli, may Allah have mercy on him. This part covers:
 
- Appreciating Allah's power
- Establishing the prayer 
- Commanding what is right and forbidding what is wrong #
- Being patient with trials 
- Not being haughty or walking about arrogantly 
- Lowering one's voice and speaking to people gently 
- Avoiding harsh speech and raising one's voice beyond what is necessary 

Related Podcasts: 

Further Reading: 

Please like, share and subscribe to The Foreword. You can also support this channel (and this blog) by purchasing a copy of The Big Step:

Thursday, 14 June 2018

Jumuʿah Prayer on Eid

A translation of this fatwa from Naseem al-Sham


http://www.elfagr.com/2255945


Question:

In the Name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful. May the peace, blessings and mercy of Allah be upon you. Is the obligation to pray the Jumuʿah prayer dropped if the first day of Eid is a Friday? Thank you very much and may you always be in a good state.

Answer (Imam Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān Al-Būṭī, may Allah have mercy on him):

The obligation to pray the Jumuʿah prayer is not lifted because of it coinciding with Eid if the person praying is present inside the city or town in which the Eid and Jumuʿah prayers are held. The obligation is only lifted for someone who comes from another town to pray the Eid prayer, for if he returns to his town he is not obliged to return once again to the town in which he performed the Eid prayer in order to perform the Jumuʿah prayer.

[This is the muʿtamad position of the Shāfiʿī school. Please see Fatḥ al-ʿAlām bi Sharḥ Murshid al-Anām fī al-Fiqh ʿalā Madhab as-Sādat ash-Shāfiʿiyyah by Imam Muḥammad ʿAbdullah al-
Jurdanī (Beirut: Dār Ibn Hazm, 1418/1997), v.3, p.13-14.]